The Hellenistic period, following Alexander’s conquests, saw the rise of philosophical schools that offered new answers to the challenges of a chaotic world. Among these were the Cynics and Sceptics, who, in their distinct ways, questioned conventional society and the possibility of definitive knowledge. Their emergence reflected a broader psychological shift: a growing despair of the world and a turning inward to seek individual virtue or salvation, rather than focusing on building an ideal state. These philosophies, though often radical, resonated with weary individuals seeking independence from external circumstances.
Table of Contents
The Cynic school, founded by Diogenes (a disciple of Socrates’s follower Antisthenes), advocated a radical “return to nature.” Diogenes, famously living like a dog (hence “cynic,” meaning “canine”), rejected all social conventions: religion, manners, dress, housing, and even common decency. He believed that all conventional stamps on things—generals, kings, honor, wisdom, happiness, riches—were false, mere “base metal with lying superscription.” His goal was virtue and moral freedom achieved through liberation from desire, an indifference to worldly goods that would emancipate one from fear. While personally vigorous, his doctrine appealed to those disillusioned with the complexities and artificialities of civilization, emphasizing subjective contentment through resignation rather than positive action or societal reform.
❓ Can We Truly Know Nothing? The Sceptical Challenge
Scepticism, as a formal philosophical doctrine, was first proclaimed by Pyrrho, who accompanied Alexander’s army to India. Pyrrho’s skepticism extended beyond the senses to morality and logic, asserting that there could never be any rational ground for preferring one course of action over another. In practice, this led his followers to conform to local customs without holding any firm beliefs, treating all pagan rituals as equally unprovable. Scepticism appealed to many unphilosophic minds, who, observing the diversity and acerbity of philosophical disputes, concluded that all claims to knowledge were ultimately unattainable. It offered a “lazy man’s consolation,” suggesting that the ignorant were as wise as the learned, and recommended itself as an antidote to worry by emphasizing the inherent uncertainty of the future.
💡 How Did Scepticism Influence Plato’s Academy?
While Pyrrho himself wisely wrote no books, his doctrines, particularly the argument that all deduction relies on unprovable general principles, cut at the root of Aristotelian philosophy. Surprisingly, after Pyrrho’s death, his modified skeptical ideas were adopted by Plato’s own Academy, under the leadership of Arcesilaus. Arcesilaus interpreted Plato’s Socratic method as a means to leave the reader in doubt, arguing that either side of any question could be maintained with equal plausibility. This skeptical phase of the Academy, lasting for about two hundred years, emphasized intellectual dexterity and the avoidance of fallacies, but often led to an indifference to truth itself. Carneades, a later head of the Academy, famously demonstrated this by arguing both for and against justice in Rome, shocking traditionalists but delighting the modern-minded Roman youth with his unedifying yet logically compelling argumentation. While Scepticism eventually faded in the face of a growing demand for dogmatic religion, its intellectual challenges profoundly shaped the philosophical landscape, forcing thinkers to re-examine the very foundations of knowledge and belief.
—
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1945.
More Topics
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
- Stoicism: How Did It Teach Virtue in a Chaotic World?
- Plotinus: The Last Great Philosopher of Antiquity and the Birth of Neoplatonism
- Socrates: Was He a Gadfly, a Saint, or Both?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
