The Hellenistic period, a time of widespread uncertainty and social upheaval, gave rise to two dominant philosophical schools: Stoicism and Epicureanism. Both sought to provide a path to tranquility and happiness in a chaotic world, but they approached the problem from radically different perspectives. Epicurus (342?-270? B.C.), the founder of Epicureanism, famously asserted that pleasure is the good, and he consistently adhered to the consequences of this view. His philosophy was primarily designed to secure inner peace and freedom from fear, a direct response to the anxieties of his age.
Table of Contents
Epicurus’s life in Athens, after a challenging youth, was one of placid simplicity, largely devoted to teaching in his famous garden. He lived on bread and water, finding profound pleasure in such basic sustenance, and openly scorned luxurious pleasures for the inconveniences they brought. He cultivated deep human friendships, a trait that often seemed to contradict his egoistic ethical theories. He believed that the wise man’s goal was not the presence of intense pleasure, but the absence of pain, a state of equilibrium achieved through moderation and the avoidance of restless desires like wealth and honor. He famously claimed that a man could be happy even on the rack, demonstrating an extraordinary fortitude in the face of chronic ill health.
⚛️ How Did Epicurus Embrace Materialism and Reject Determinism?
To combat the two greatest sources of fear—religion and the dread of death—Epicurus constructed an elaborate theoretical philosophy. He was a materialist, following Democritus in believing that the world consisted of atoms and the void. However, he diverged from Democritus by rejecting strict determinism. To allow for human freedom and to escape the religious notion of fate, he introduced the concept of atomic “swerve”—a slight, uncaused deviation from the atoms’ natural downward path, allowing for collisions and the formation of complex structures. For Epicurus, the soul was also material, composed of fine particles, and dispersed at death, rendering death “nothing to us” since sensation ceases. He firmly believed in the existence of gods but was convinced they did not interfere in human affairs, being rational hedonists who lived in complete blessedness and felt no temptation to govern the human world. This meant that divination, augury, and the fear of divine anger were mere superstitions, freeing humanity from a significant source of anxiety.
📜 What Was the Enduring Legacy of Epicureanism?
Epicurus had no interest in science for its own sake, valuing it solely as a means to provide naturalistic explanations for phenomena that superstition attributed to divine agency. He believed that if multiple naturalistic explanations existed, there was no need to choose between them, as long as they excluded supernatural interference. This anti-intellectual stance, while limiting scientific progress within his school, served a useful purpose in protesting against the growing devotion to magic and astrology in later antiquity. The philosophy of Epicurus, though often seen as “swinish” by critics, was a serious and earnest attempt to alleviate human suffering. His gospel of tranquility, emphasizing moderation, self-sufficiency, and freedom from fear, resonated with a weary age and found its most eloquent expression in the poetry of Lucretius. Despite its eventual decline in popularity compared to Stoicism, Epicureanism offered a powerful alternative worldview, a path to happiness grounded in a materialistic and non-deterministic understanding of the cosmos.
—
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1945.
More Topics
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
- Stoicism: How Did It Teach Virtue in a Chaotic World?
- Plotinus: The Last Great Philosopher of Antiquity and the Birth of Neoplatonism
- Socrates: Was He a Gadfly, a Saint, or Both?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
