Following the fall of the Marcos dictatorship, the Philippines experienced a remarkable period of democratic reform and human rights improvement in the 1990s, a true human rights renaissance. This success story was not purely a domestic affair; it was shaped by a unique convergence of interests between the newly democratic Philippine government and the United States. During this time, a shared focus on non-militaristic goals led to a dramatic decrease in state-sponsored violence.
Table of Contents
📉 From Dictatorship to Democracy: A New Era
After the peaceful ‘People Power’ revolution toppled the U.S.-supported Marcos regime, the Philippines restored constitutional democracy in 1986. The new 1987 Constitution guaranteed fundamental human rights and tolerated peaceful political opposition. The administrations of Presidents Fidel Ramos (1992-98) and Joseph Estrada (1998-2001) sustained this progress. The number of state-initiated killings and disappearances, which numbered around 7,500 per year under Marcos, dropped to less than 300 in the 1990s.
🤝 How U.S. and Filipino Interests Aligned for Reform
This improvement coincided with a major shift in U.S. foreign policy. With the Cold War over, Washington’s strategic military interest in the Philippines diminished sharply. U.S. aid plummeted from nearly $5 billion (1984-92) to just $1 billion (1993-2001). The Clinton administration’s foreign policy pivoted to focus on democracy promotion, human rights, and global trade. This agenda converged perfectly with that of the Ramos administration, which promoted the idea that sustainable economic growth could only flourish with democratic openness and human rights protections.
🕊️ The Impact of ‘Development Diplomacy’ Over Military Aid
President Ramos championed a strategy of ‘development diplomacy,’ prioritizing foreign investment over military aid. Reflecting this, U.S. aid was reclassified as ‘sustainable development’ funding, focusing on economic growth, civil society, and environmental protection. U.S. military aid was almost eliminated. This convergence on non-militaristic goals reduced the resources and incentives for domestic state repression. The Philippine military was even reassigned to non-traditional tasks like supporting public infrastructure, health missions, and environmental conservation.
—
Regilme, Salvador Santino F., Jr. Aid Imperium: United States Foreign Policy and Human Rights in Post-Cold War Southeast Asia. University of Michigan Press, 2021.
More Topics
- How a Culture of Impunity Fuels Human Rights Abuses
- What is ‘Strategic Localization’ and How Does It Work in Foreign Aid?
- What is the ‘Aid Imperium’ in U.S. Foreign Policy?
- How the Philippines Reversed Its Human Rights Crisis Under Aquino and Obama
- How Thailand’s 1990s ‘Human Rights Renaissance’ Happened
- How Thaksin’s ‘War on Drugs’ Devastated Human Rights in Thailand
- How ‘Interest Convergence’ Shapes Foreign Aid’s Impact on Human Rights
