In the latter half of the fifth century B.C., the grand pre-Socratic philosophical systems faced a formidable challenge from a skeptical movement, spearheaded by Protagoras, the most prominent of the Sophists. The term “Sophist,” originally meaning “professor,” referred to individuals who earned a living by teaching young men practical skills, particularly the art of disputation and rhetoric. Protagoras’s most famous doctrine, “Man is the measure of all things, of things that are that they are, and of things that are not that they are not,” encapsulates the essence of this skeptical turn, suggesting that truth is subjective and relative to each individual’s perception.
Table of Contents
This doctrine implies that when individuals hold differing opinions, there is no objective truth by which one is definitively right and the other wrong. This idea, presumably rooted in the perceived “deceitfulness” of the senses, led to a nuanced form of relativism. While one judgment might not be “truer” than another, Protagoras suggested it could be “better” in terms of its practical consequences. This pragmatic outlook, where the utility of a belief determines its value, foreshadowed later philosophical movements like pragmatism. For Protagoras, if objective truth was elusive, then the practical consensus of the majority, as embodied in law and convention, became the arbiter of what to believe and how to act.
🗣️ How Did Sophists Challenge Traditional Authority?
The Sophists, including Protagoras, operated in a dynamic Athenian democracy where oratorical skill was crucial for success in law courts and public life. They taught the art of arguing for or against any opinion, often without being committed to a particular conclusion themselves. This approach, while intellectually liberating, shocked those who viewed philosophy as a way of life intrinsically linked to religion and virtue. To traditionalists, the Sophists appeared frivolous and immoral, accused of subverting ancient beliefs and promoting impiety. Plato, a fierce critic, often caricatured them, but it’s clear that many Sophists were genuinely concerned with philosophical inquiry, pushing the boundaries of intellectual honesty by being prepared to follow an argument wherever it might lead, even if to skepticism.
⚖️ What Were the Political and Moral Implications of Protagoras’s Philosophy?
Protagoras’s skepticism about objective truth had profound implications for politics and morality. His view that the majority, for practical purposes, determined what was true led him to a defense of law, convention, and traditional morality. Although he expressed agnosticism about the existence of gods, he believed they ought to be worshipped for social cohesion. This perspective, where theoretical skepticism coexists with practical adherence to societal norms, highlights a key tension in his thought. While his ideas might seem to undermine absolute moral standards, they also provided a framework for a functioning society based on agreed-upon conventions. The intellectual ferment he introduced, by questioning established certainties and emphasizing individual perception, laid groundwork for future philosophical debates on the nature of knowledge and reality, even if it also contributed to the “intellectual anarchy” that critics like Plato feared.
—
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1945.
More Topics
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
- Stoicism: How Did It Teach Virtue in a Chaotic World?
- Plotinus: The Last Great Philosopher of Antiquity and the Birth of Neoplatonism
- Socrates: Was He a Gadfly, a Saint, or Both?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
