Socrates (c. 469-399 B.C.) remains one of the most enigmatic and influential figures in Western philosophy, a man whose historical reality is inextricably intertwined with the diverse and often conflicting accounts of his pupils, Xenophon and Plato. An Athenian citizen of moderate means, he spent his life engaged in relentless disputation, teaching philosophy to the young without charging a fee, unlike the Sophists. His trial, condemnation, and execution in 399 B.C. at the age of seventy are undisputed facts, but the true nature of his character and teachings continues to be a subject of intense debate. Was he the pious, wholesome figure depicted by Xenophon, or the complex, intellectually challenging persona in Plato’s dialogues?
Table of Contents
Xenophon, a military man, portrayed Socrates as eminently pious and morally upright, whose ideas were rather commonplace. This defense, however, struggles to explain the fierce hostility Socrates faced, which ultimately led to his death. Plato, on the other hand, presented Socrates as a character of extraordinary depth and consistency, a master of dialectic who constantly questioned assumptions and exposed intellectual pretense. While Plato’s dialogues are works of great literary genius, the extent to which his “Socrates” reflects the historical man remains a central problem for historians. Nevertheless, the Apology, Plato’s account of Socrates’s defense speech, is widely regarded as offering the most definitive picture of his character: a man supremely confident in himself, indifferent to worldly success, guided by an inner divine voice, and convinced that clear thinking was the most important requisite for right living.
🗣️ What Was Socrates’s Dialectical Method?
Socrates’s primary preoccupation was ethics, not scientific speculation. The earliest Platonic dialogues, believed to be most Socratic, focus on the search for definitions of ethical terms like temperance, friendship, and courage. He famously claimed to know nothing, asserting that his only wisdom lay in knowing his own ignorance. Yet, he believed that knowledge was attainable and of utmost importance, particularly in leading a virtuous life. His method was dialectic—the pursuit of knowledge through question and answer. By relentlessly questioning others, he would expose inconsistencies in their beliefs, forcing them to confront their own ignorance. This method, while intellectually stimulating for some, undoubtedly earned him many powerful enemies among those whose pretensions to wisdom he exposed, making the hostility he faced understandable.
🕊️ How Did Socrates Face Death with Serenity?
Socrates’s final hours, as depicted in Plato’s Phaedo, present a profound ethical ideal: a wise and good man utterly devoid of the fear of death. His refusal to escape prison, arguing that he must obey the laws of Athens even if they unjustly condemned him, demonstrated an unwavering commitment to justice. His serenity in the face of death was deeply intertwined with his belief in the immortality of the soul. He saw death not as an end, but as a separation of the soul from the body, a liberation that allowed the soul to pursue true being and knowledge in an invisible, eternal world. This dualism between soul and body, reason and sense-perception, formed a cornerstone of his philosophy and would profoundly influence Plato and subsequent Christian theology. Socrates’s mastery over bodily passions, his indifference to comfort, and his unwavering pursuit of truth, even unto death, cemented his image as a philosophical martyr, a figure who, despite his lack of written works, left an indelible mark on the ethical and intellectual aspirations of humanity.
—
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1945.
More Topics
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
- Stoicism: How Did It Teach Virtue in a Chaotic World?
- Plotinus: The Last Great Philosopher of Antiquity and the Birth of Neoplatonism
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- Aristotle’s Physics: Why Did It Dominate Science for 2000 Years?
- The Hellenistic World: Did Alexander’s Conquests Change Philosophy Forever?
- Cynics and Sceptics: Can We Live Without Convention or Certainty?
