Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225/26-1274 A.D.) stands as the undisputed giant of Scholastic philosophy. His system was so influential that it remains the official philosophical doctrine in Catholic educational institutions to this day.
A Dominican friar, Aquinas accomplished the monumental task of harmonizing the philosophy of Aristotle with Christian dogma. This feat profoundly shaped Western thought and earned him a unique authority, placing him almost on par with the early Church Fathers. His work marked a decisive victory for Aristotle over Plato as the philosophical foundation for Christian theology, a position Aristotle had not held in antiquity.
Aquinas’s most important work, the Summa contra Gentiles, was designed to establish the truth of the Christian religion through natural reason. It was addressed to readers who were not yet Christian, often imagined as the great Arab philosophers.
He argued that while natural reason could prove some parts of the faith, such as the existence of God and the immortality of the soul, other core doctrines like the Trinity or the Incarnation required revelation. Crucially, he maintained that nothing in revelation was contrary to reason, thus asserting a fundamental harmony between faith and reason.
In this work, he rejected the famous ontological argument for God’s existence (used by Saint Anselm and later by Descartes). Instead, he offered his own five proofs for God’s existence (the “Five Ways”), which were based on empirical observation and logical deduction, including the well-known argument from the unmoved mover.
🧠 God’s Nature and Knowledge: A Precise Definition
Aquinas meticulously defined God’s nature, largely through negative attributes: God is eternal, unchanging, without composition, and is identical to His own essence, goodness, and intelligence.
He asserted that God understands Himself perfectly and, through this self-understanding, knows all things. A key point of contention for earlier philosophers was whether God could know particular things or only universals. Aquinas, in line with the Christian belief in Providence, argued that God knows singulars as their cause.
He further explained that God can even know future contingent events by seeing all things as if they are present, since He Himself exists outside of time. Aquinas also contended that God’s will is free; He was not compelled by logic to create the world, but was motivated to do so by His own goodness.
⚖️ Ethics, Sin, and the Soul: Aristotle’s Influence
In ethics, Aquinas largely followed Aristotle, asserting that human happiness consists in the contemplation of God. However, he added that ultimate, perfect happiness is only achievable in the afterlife through divine light. He also believed that evil is unintentional—a privation of good—and has an accidental cause that is ultimately good.
His views on original sin, predestination, and eternal punishment for mortal sin were broadly Augustinian, though he consistently sought to provide a more logical and systematic framework for these doctrines.
Aquinas maintained that the soul is the form of the body, creating a single unified entity in a human being. While animal souls are not immortal, he argued that the human intellect is. He also argued for the indissolubility of marriage and condemned birth control, basing these ethical rules on rational considerations of nature’s purpose rather than solely on divine commands.
While some of his arguments might seem dated or based on questionable assumptions today, Aquinas’s ability to create a vast, systematic, and intellectually rigorous philosophical edifice remains a monumental achievement. His integration of Aristotelian thought into Christian theology with minimal alteration continues to influence Catholic philosophy profoundly.
—
Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. Simon and Schuster, 1945.
More Topics
- The Thirteenth Century: A Zenith of Medieval Power and Intellectual Ferment?
- Beyond Aquinas: What Did Franciscan Thinkers Add to Medieval Philosophy?
- The Eclipse of the Papacy: How Did the Church’s Authority Begin to Wane?
- The Papacy’s Rise: How Did It Navigate the Chaos of the Dark Ages?
- John the Scot: Was He a Rebel Philosopher in the Dark Ages?
- The Church’s Revival: How Eleventh-Century Reforms Sparked Papal Power?
- The Golden Age of Islam: How Did Muslim Scholars Preserve Ancient Philosophy?
